Article Text
Blames Failure Of R. F. C. On Publicity Sullivan Thinks Michigan Situation Brought on by Publication of List of Borrowings by Banks. BY MARK SULLIVAN. (Copyright, 1933, for The Observer.) WASHINGTON, Feb. 19. — The closing of Michigan banks last week contributed a factor to the central problem which underlies or permeates practically every other question in politics. That question is whether there will be inflation of the currency. Superficially, the Michigan incident was interpreted as one more unsettling event and therefore as pointing toward inflation. In fact, however, the Michigan bank closings contribute toward greater likelihood that Mr. Roosevelt, as soon as he is President, will be given by congress large power over the government's fiscal affairs. That the Democrats, strongly in control of the new congress, will take this or an equivalent step, is now practically certain. It is universally accepted that Mr. Roosevelt, in the exercise of the unusual powers to be given him, and in all respects, will work in a direction opposite to inflation. PUBLICITY HURTS. The disturbing fact about the Michigan closings is that they came more than a year after the government had set up the Reconstruction Finance corporation for the purpose, among others, of preventing just such events by advancing government funds. Subsequently congress decreed that all loans made by the R. F. C. should be made public. What now transpires is that this enforced publicity seriously reduces the ability of the R. F. C. to avert bank closings. It is now almost possible to assert that loans by the R. F. C. when coupled with publicity, have the effect, not of preventing bank embarrassments, but of stimulating them. Newspapers on the 27th of last month printed a page and a half of the names of banks and other institutions which had borrowed from the R. F. C. There followed on February 4 in Louisiana, and on February 14 in Michigan, two of the most disquieting events of the whole three and a half years of depression, in the form of state-wide bank moratoriums. As a part of the same effect, what is loosely called "hoarding" of currency went to a new high peak. The quantity of currency outstanding last week was $5,854,000,000. The last previous peak had been $5,775,000,000 July 6 last year. MONEY IN TILLS. Not all the additional currency outstanding reflects hoarding. Some represents money kept in tills for normal business purposes by merchants in towns where banks have failed. Some represents unusual quantities of currency kept in tills by banks that fear runs. Undoubtedly much represents currency withdrawn by depositors who are fearful about the safety of banks. The sum of all is that unless the requirement of publicity is repealed by congress, the R. F. C. has to some degree ceased to have power to strengthen the banking situation. The fundamental fact is that a bank which has borrowed from the R. F. C. has at once strengthened its position and also demonstrated its soundness, for the R. F. C. makes loans only on good security. Unhappily this basic fact does not alter the disposition of a depositor in such times as these to become uneasy when he runs his finger down the column of a newspaper and finds his own bank listed as a borrower from the R. F. C. MAY REPEAL PROVISION. The hope of Washington officials is that by the present time, three weeks after the last publication of R. F. C. loans, the unfortunate consequences have worn themselves out. Bank failures last week dropped to 23, as compared with 55 the week before. Another publication of R. F. C. loans will not be due for some time. In the meantime there is reasonable expectation that congress may repeal the publicity provision. Conservative Democrats favor this course. The member of the house who led the movement for publicity last month, Edgar Howard of Nebraska, is a silverite, and was for many years secretary to William Jennings Bryan. In the Michigan episode, as throughout the depression, one question clamors for answer. Why have Canada and Britain been able to pass through the depression without one bank failure while the United States has had thousands? The answer was given to a senate committee last Friday by David F. Houston, Democratic secretary of the treasury in Woodrow Wilson's administration, and now president of the Mutual Life Insurance company of New York: "I see no other solution than a unified banking system," Mr. Houston said. PREVENTED BY POLITICS. A unified system is prevented, in part by members of congress who, during the recent debate on the Glass banking bill, stood up eloquently for preserving little, weak individual banks. A collateral answer to the same question has been given several times by Governor Eugene Meyer, Jr., of the Federal Reserve system. "We have bank failures in America, Mr. Meyer says in effect, because politics will not permit us to require sound practice by all banks. Politics insists that states, in addition to the federal government, shall have the right to charter banks. Between the federal government and the states a competition in leniency results. When Washington tries to make bank regulations rigid, the banks are able to retort, in effect, "Very well, we will get our charter at the state capital."