Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
Of the German-American Savings Bank, Tacoma. THE CASH AND BOOKS GONE All Money and Valuable Papers Removed to Columbia National. President Allen Adjudged in Contempt of Court for Secreting the Bank of Tacoma's Books - City of Tacoma Sues Nelson Bennett for Money He Borrowed From Boggs. Tacoma, Oct. 22.-Special.-Receiver S. and secured Safe R. Balkwill, Deposit of the Savings German-American Bank, partial possession of his trust this morning. and the bank's doors were closed. The case came up before Judge E. N. Parker at 10 o'clock this morning, the hour set for the hearing of the city's exceptions to the stay bond of $60,000, put up by the bank. At that hour Mr. Balkwill, his attorney, Frederick A. Brown, and Assistant City Attorney Gibbs, were present. None of the bank's bondsmen were in court to justify under oath and the court forthwith declared it void. The attorney for the bank presented a new bond with three additional sureties, but the court peremptorily rejected this bond, and ordered the receiver to take possession of the bank. When the receiver, accompanied by his attorney, the assistant city attorney and Chief of Police Smith, arrived at the bank they were met by Attorney Hammond, of the bank, and Secretary Weisbach. Possession was refused, but the receiver entered the wicket gate near the cashier's desk and formally announced that he was in charge. The officials of the bank thereupon withdrew. taking with them the cash, books and letter books of the bank. These were deposited in the vaults of the Columbia National, which occupies the next room to the savings bank. Receiver Balkwill this afternoon reported to the court that he had secured $1.10 and no more of the bank's assets, and none of the securities or books. He applied for an order to the Columbia National for them to turn over the cash and books. Thus the matter stands. The bank has filed an objection to the order, rejecting the stay bond and that ordering the recelver to take possession. Its attorneys claim that under the statute they should have been allowed not less than three days in which to have their sureties justify. They claim further that only sixtysix hours had elapsed since the city's exception to the bond was filed. The attorneys also set up that under the statute, if the bond is rejected. they have the rigt to file another bond, which must be proceeded against in the same manner as the first. On this ground the bank's attorneys have advised its officers to resist the receiver. This afternoon additional counsel in the firm of Crowley, Sullivan & Grosscup, was retained, and certified copies in the record of the case were obtained from the county clerk. Tomorrow the attorneys will apply to the supreme court for a writ of prohibition, restraining the receiver from interfering with the business of the bank until the appeal is decided.