Central State Bank (Muskogee, OK)

Episode Information

Episode UID
49005171506
Episode Type
Run โ†’ Suspension โ†’ Closure
Bank Type
state
Bank ID
4900517 routing
Routing Number
49-0051
Start Date
June 17, 1925
Location
Muskogee, Oklahoma (35.748, -95.370)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini (chosen from majority vote of a three-model LLM ensemble)
Short Digest
48a75fe7c6a9e0e1

Response Measures

None

Description

State banking department took over and closed the bank amid publicity and deposit withdrawals; later litigation over assets continued.

Events (3)

1. June 17, 1925 Other
Newspaper Excerpt
In one bank alone, the Central State bank of Muskogee, $114,000 is set aside to pay the surety companies if they win their suit on the Indian funds. If the banking department wins, this money will be distributed instead, among the depositors of the defunct bank ... (dispute over surety participation in failed-bank assets).
Source
newspapers
2. August 16, 1925 Run
Cause
Rumor Or Misinformation
Cause Details
Publicity of Board's statement alleging insolvency prompted depositors to begin withdrawing funds.
Measures
Clearing house discussion of support; state banking department moved to take over to prevent further withdrawals.
Newspaper Excerpt
publicity given Board's statement regarding the solvency the Central State bank ... depositors started the run
Source
newspapers
3. August 16, 1925 Suspension
Cause
Government Action
Cause Details
State banking department took possession and closed the bank to protect depositors and prevent a run.
Newspaper Excerpt
the state's examiners found the bank be solvent ... the banking department took over the Central State bank and closed its doors.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from The Daily Oklahoman, June 17, 1925

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

CASH INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS TO BE DECIDED Banking Department Strives To Save Large Sum For Citizens. Cases In which the state banking department hopes to save many hun. dreds of thousands of dollars for the depositors in banks which failed during 1921, 1922 and the early months of 1923. will come up for trial in fed eral court before Judge John H. Cot teral at Gutbrie Friday. The cases are suits by seven surety companies soiewhich claim the right to participate in the assets of the failed banks be cause they were sureties on public de posits held by the banks. surety companies have paid off -to the state, counties and cities and the federal government the amount - the deposits upon which they had written bonds, and they now are suing "for the right to share along with de "positors in the banks' assets. This has been denied in a state supreme *eourt case applying to failures before the bank guaranty law was repealed "March 31, 1923, The repeal gave the aurety companies the right to particl Date after that date. Dividends Are Sought The state will make especial objec-tion in cases where the banks had "been compelled to put up bonds such as liberty bonds, it was said Tuesday by M. W. McKenzie, attorney for the -banking department. In some cases the bonding companies are seeking dividends from the falled banks on the basis of the whole deposits they -paid off. when in fact they already have been secured to the extent of two-thirds or three-fourths of the amount by the collateral the banks -posted with them. This would "wult in the surety companies getting "back practically all their money. while depositors were getting back -something less than half of their be said. McKenzie will ask the court to limit the participation of the surety com-panies in dividends to the actual ris': carried, If they are allowed to pa "ficipate at all, or to make the surety companies disgorge the liberty bonds which they took from the banks 9d -special protection. He contends the banks had no authority in law to pledge their assets to the surety compantes in this way. There are $92,000 of these bonds. Large Sums Infolved The cases involve $900,000 of federal government deposits of Indian money, $721,000 of state deposits, $903 of county deposits, 000 of city de posits, and $266,000 of school deposits In one bank alone. the Central State bank of Muskogee, $114,000 is set aside to pay the surety companies if they win their suit on the Indian funds. If the banking department wins, this money will be distributed instend, among the depositors of the defunct bank and will swell their divi. dend materially. The same situation obtains in the other banks involved.


Article from Muskogee Daily Phoenix and Times-Democrat, August 16, 1925

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

Lattimore Tells Why Bank Charges Dropped CONTINUED ONE bankers present, that if they found the Central State he would refuse to open his doors the next morning. Reported Bank Solvent "The bankers assembled at the meeting checked up the Central State loans, made their return the clearing association by saying that while the Central State had some paper, the bank solvent. Roy Wolcott, bank the time, was at the meeting. His had amined the Central State bank few days before and had declared it solvent. "The next day the clearing house association met again. The affidavits have here now, the county attorney produced several photostatic copies affidavits. "show that at this time, Mr. Board told the clearing house men he would earry the contract buy the Central State bank the clearing house association would put $100,000. amount was later reduced, in Board's demands, to about $13,000, which to protect the Exchange National on notes held the Central State. The clearing house was urged then that would better pay this money than see bank broke," Mr. Lattimore emphasized Agreed to File Complaints evening that day, the state banking department, 'to protect the positors and prevent run bank caused by publicity given Board's statement regarding the solvency the Central State bank' took over the Central State bank and closed its doors. bit later Thompson and DeWitt filed suit against the Exchange National, breach contract because Mr Board's bank had not bought the Central State. This suit was dismissed by order of the state banking "When Mr. McIntosh came to my office months ago to have me file the complaints against Thompson and which nad been missed by my agreed. McIntosh dictated the complaints my stenographer, and waited only local of the banking department, Mrs. Pritchett, to sign the complaints before filing them before justice of the peace. that time suspected nothing wrong the complaints," the county attorney continued. McIntosh Asked Delay few days later and about 30 minutes before Pritchett arrived my office to sign the complaints, handed letter from Mr. McIntosh, asking that delay the criminal time, that he would me fully from Oklahoma City. He was then Tulsa. letter explaining came from Oklahoma The note he had stated that he had civil he wished to get into before the criminal complaints filed. That set me thinking, then got more and have here photostatic copy of, civil that McIntosh prepared and about to file against the Exchange National bank and another bank This about four weeks Mr. Lattimore produced the coptes of the petition in the civil sult. "Intend to Take Chance" "By means of this petition, McIntosh planned to force the Exchange National bank to pay approximately some lesser amount. to be used for the depositors in the Central State bank. The suit threat based on the old contract the Exchange had made to buy the Central State bank. portion of this suit and of the negotiations pending which was asked to hold up the criminal plaints was directed at another bank. stated in the petition that the other bank, in buying the Exchange had assumed the latter bank's Whether this true or not McIntosh did not know then. He merely to take chance. bank commissioner though, that of the proportions of the one, asking for would be serious threat and would probably force the bank to some mise, while McIntosh never intended force the criminal complaints,' Mr. Lattimore believes, Claimed Excess of Assets "Here's where would have been holding the sack: In this Intosh stated that the the time Board backed out of his agreement to purchase the Central State bank, going concern, with bright prospects for the future. He also alleged that because of publicity given Board's declaration of Insolvency of the Central State, the banking department forced take over the bank because depositors started the "Again, in suit to be filed civil court McIntosh declared that 'the assets the Central State bank were, now, far in liabilities the bank bank going and These statements rectly refuted the allegations he made in the criminal complaints. Pictures His Predicament "Whereas the complaints charged that and DeWitt took posits in the State bank while knowing be the civil suit declared the bank to been and going with bright prospects for the future," the county attorney asserted. what would jury do? If tried to former officers for accepting deposits in insolvent bank, could and would point out The the bank's assets are far in excess its liabilities; that going cern with prospects for the ture: that clearing house assoclation found the bank to be solvent the time closed; that the state's examiners found the bank be solvent at their examination few days before. "McIntosh would have made this county attorney's office and the people this county out be fools for charging men with being criminals when the state itself believes them to be wronged and innocent men. That's why the criminal complaints have not been filed. believe the public will agree that am right washing my hands of the whole affair, told McIntosh was doing," Lattimore averred. Mr. McIntosh was in Oklahoma City and could not reached for He has the authority, it said. to file the criminal actions without from Mr. Lattimore, would then assume all responsibility and would be telling two stories the same transactions, one story the civil suit, the criminal court, was pointed out.