Union Bank of Maryland (Baltimore, MD)

Episode Information

Episode UID
5202952090411
Episode Type
Run Only
Bank Type
state
Bank ID
520295209 hash
Start Date
March 24, 1834
Location
Baltimore, Maryland (39.290, -76.612)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini (chosen from majority vote of a three-model LLM ensemble)
Short Digest
927b332b9a37df51

Response Measures

None

Events (1)

1. March 24, 1834 Run
Cause
Local Banks
Cause Details
Run triggered by the stoppage of payments at the Bank of Maryland and perceived intimate connection between the two banks.
Newspaper Excerpt
there was, yesterday, an immense run on the latter Bank... the streets of Baltimore, in the vicinity of the Bank, were yesterday crowded by People pressing to obtain metallic currency for the paper in their hands.
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (2)

Article from Alexandria Gazette, March 27, 1834

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

MARYLAND BANKS. In the Senate on Tuesday, Mr. CLAY rose said that he had heard, and he presumed and that every member of the Senate had also heard, that, yesterday, a Bank, chartered by the State of Maryland, and situated in Baltimore, had stopped payment. The evidence of the fact was to be found in the public prints of this morning. He had further heard, as he also presumed most of the Senate had heard, that, in consequence of a connection, supposed or had actual, between the Bank of Maryland, which thus exploded, and the Union Bank of Maryland, one of the Banks selected by the Treasury Department as a depository of the public revenue, there was, yesterday, an immense run on the latter Bank. The information which reached him was, that the streets of Baltimore, in the vicinity of the Bank, were yesterday crowded by People pressing to obtain metallic currency for the paper in their hands. The connection that between the two Banks was so intimate, stabiligreat danger was apprehended as to the ty of the Union Bank. In this Union Bank, it appeared, from the that returns made by the Treasury Department, himself the Secretary of the Treasury was a stockholder. To what extent the Secretary stockholder, did not appear, but his name of was a to be found on the list of the stockholders the was Union Bank, one of the Banks selected by him for the reception and charge of the public deposites. He had heard that the Secretary He a stockholder to a considerable extent. had was heard that the stock held by the Secretary of in that Bank constituted a considerable part time his property, and that he had been for some a Director in that Bank, pevious to his removal to this city. He hoped that it would turn out that the Union Bank was in a safe condition; and that there were no just grounds for the apprehension which seemed to exist, as to its safety. He hoped it would turn out that the Secretary of the Treasury was not a stockholder in this Bank to extent which could authorize an impression enter that any he had suffered his own interests to into the considerations which had led him to se lect this Bank as one of the depositories of the public He had money. also heard this morning, but he would not undertake to vouch for the truth of the ruthat, in consequence of the connexion between mor, the Union Bank and the Bank of Mary lank, a Treasury draft, or Treasury drafts, to the amount of 150,000 dollars, had, in the course of the last few days, been furnished to the Union Bank of Maryland, by the Secretary of the Treasury. He did not know how far this rumor was founded in act, but he did know that it was the official duty of the Senate to inquire into the fact, whether there was any= danger to the public interests which was likely to result from the circumstance of the public money being in that institution. After these remarks he would submit the folresolution, and would ask that it might be at this time, in order an lowing considered the Secretary: that early reply might be received from Resolved, That the Seeretary of the Treasury be directed to report to the Senate what amount of public money is now on deposite in the Union Bank of Maryland, and on what account it was deposited; and whether any Treasury drafts, contingent or other, have been, during the month of March, 1834, farnished to the said Bank enable it to meet any demands which might be made upon it. The motion to consider the resolution requiring the unanimous consent of the SenateMr. FORSYTH rose and said, that if the gentleman from Kentucky had introduced the resolution without any remarks, he would not have interposed any objection to its adoption. But, after what had been said, he thought it was due to the Secretary of the Treasury that he should have an opportunity of seeing the resolution.-The fact of the Secretary of the Treasury being a stockholder in the Union Bank of Maryland, was on record. but the extent to which he was interested was not known. He did not imagine, however, that it would be found. on examination, that the Secretary held sufficient stock to render it an object with him to select this Bank for the custody of any part of the public money. He objected to the consideration of the resolution at this time. Mr. CLAY said he would make one single remark. As he had already stated, he did not know the amount of stock held by the Secretain the Union Bank. He had heard that it ry was a considerable sum, and this he had heard when he was in Baltimore. The fnct, however, was apparent, that he had stock in the institution, and therefore the inquiry was a proper one. The resolution was then laid over.


Article from Richmond Enquirer, April 1, 1834

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

[Remainder in our next.] IN SENATE. Tuesday, March 25, 1834. MARYLAND BANKS. Mr. Clay rose and said that he had heard, and he presumed that every member of the Senate had also heard, that, yesterday, a Bank, chartered by the State of Maryland, and situated in Baltimore, 'had stopped payment. The evidence of the fact was to be found in the public prints of this morning. He had further heard, as he also presumed most of the Senate had heard, that, in consequence of a connection, supposed or actual, between the Bank of Maryland, which had thus exploded, and the Union Bank of Maryland, one of the Banks selected by the Treasury Department as a depository of the public revenue, there was, yest rday, an immense run on the latter Bank. The information which reached him was, that the streets of Baltimore, in the vicinity of the Bank, were yesterday crowded by People pressing 10.obtain metallic currency for the paper in their hands. The connection between the two Banks was so intimate, that great dan. ger was apprehended as to the stability of the Union Bank. In this Union Bank, it appeared, from the returns made by the Treasury Department, that the Secretary of the Treasury was himself a stockholder. To what extent the was a but his name Secretary stockholder, did not-appear, was to be found on the list of the stockholders of he-Union Bank, one of the Banks selected by him for the reception and charge of the public deposites. Re had heardithat the Secretary was a stockholder to a considerable extent He had heard that the stock held by the Secretary in that Bank constituted a considerable part of his property, and that he had been for some time a Director the Bank, previous to his removal to this city. He hoped that it would turn out that the Union Bank was in a safe condition; and that there were no just grounds for the apprehension which seemed to exist, as to safety. He hoped it would were out that the Secretary of the Treasury was not a stockholder in this Bank to any extent which could authorise an impression that he had suffered his own interests to enter into the considerations which led him to select this Bank as one of the depositories of the public money. He had also heard this morning, but he would not un. dertake to vouch for the (ruth of the rumor, that, in consequence of the connexion between the Union Bank and the Bank of Maryland, a Treasury draft, or Treasury drafts, to the amount of 150,000 dollars, had, in the course of the last few days, been fornished to the Union Bank of Maryland, by the Secretary of the Treasury. He did not know how far this remor was founded in fact, but he did know that it was the official duty of the Senate la inquire into the fact, whether there was any danger to the public interests which was likely to result from the circumstance of the public money being in that institution. After these remarks he would submit the following resolution, and would ask that it might be considerΓ©d at this time in order that an early reply might be received from the Secretary: Resolved, That the Secretary of the Treasury be directed to report to the Senate what amount of public money is now on deposite in the Union Bank of Maryland, and on what account it was deposited; and whether any Treasury drafts, contingentor other, have been, during the month of March, 1834, furnished to the said Bank to enable it to meet any demands which might be made upon it. This motion to consider the resolution requiring the unanimous consent of the SenateMr. Forsylh rose and said, that if the gentleman from Kentucky had introduced the resolution without any remarks, he would not have interposed any objection to its adoption. But, after what had been said, he thought it was due to the|Secretary of the Treasury, that he should have an opportunity of seeing the resolution. The fact of the Secretary of the Treasury being a stockholder in the Union Bank of Maryland, was on record, but the ex. tent to which he was interested was not known. He did not imagine, however, that it would be found on exami nation, that the Secretary held sufficient stock to render " an object with him to select this Bank for the custody of any past of the public money. He objected to the consideration of i resolution at this time. Mr. Clay said he would make one single remark. As he had already stated, he did not know the amount of stock held by the Secretary in the Union Bank. He had heard new