gpt-5-mini (chosen from majority vote of a three-model LLM ensemble)
Short Digest
2ec2e32c93306702
Response Measures
None
Description
Court restraint and appointment of receivers indicates suspension leading to permanent closure/receivership.
Events (2)
1.June 21, 1913Suspension
Cause
Government Action
Cause Details
Court order found insufficient reserve under 1904 act and restrained company from carrying on business except to conserve assets.
Newspaper Excerpt
The order of the court restrains the company from carrying on its business, other than conserving assets.
Source
newspapers
2.July 15, 1913Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
J. N. Robertson, appointed receiver for the company pending a decision by the Supreme Court, will act as receiver for the property ... keeping it intact until the litigation is settled.
Source
newspapers
Newspaper Articles (12)
1.April 1, 1913The Sentinel=recordHot Springs, AR
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
TRUST COMPANY IN TROUBLE. Atlanta, Ga., March 31.-The Guarantee Trust and Banking Company today was ordered by Judge George L. Bell of the Superior Court to appear before the court April 15 to show cause why a receiver for the company should not be appointed. Action by Judge Bell followed the institution of two suits against the company by two stockholders and
2.June 20, 1913Atlanta GeorgianAtlanta, GA
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
APPEAL CERTAIN IN GUARANTEE TRUST TRIAL If Bankruptcy Action Is Pressed, Suit Will Go to United States Supreme Court. Attorneys for plaintiffs and defendant in the Guarantee Trust and Banking Company case Thursday are trying to reach an agreement as to who shall be named receiver for the corporation, and as to the status of the business pending final outcome of the litigation on appeal. Judge Pendleton will issue an order when the lawyers reach an agreement. Prospects are this will be late Thursday. When the suit was started holders of investment bonds of the company were notified of the state of affairs and given their choice of paying installments as they became due. or holding payment pending adjudication, their bonds to remain in the same status as at the beginning of the legal action. Appeal Is Certain. The court's order Thursday is expected to determine just how far the company can proceed in carrying on its business, besides naming the receiver. Appeal is certain and efforts will be made to get decision quickly from the Supreme Court of the State. Meanwhile there is an action in involuntary bankruptcy pending in the Federal courts, and this may. be pressed. If so, the case may go to the United States Supreme Court. The case has been fought bitterly since trial began May 5. Attorneys say there is every prospect of a continued lively contest through the upper courts. Bondholders Few Here. Holders of the investment bonds are said to be comparatively few in Atlanta and in Georgia. Most of the sales have been in Northern States. It is these widely scattered investors who are most interested in the outcome. Briefly, the corporation offered a bond, sold on installments, yielding a most attractive rate of interest. Allegations of the plaintiffs, upheld by the lower court yesterday, are that an insufficient reserve was carried against these bonds; that investments of the corporation were not sound, and that the very origin of the concern was irregular in that owners of the old company, which the Guarantee took over, profited unduly by the sale.
3.June 21, 1913Atlanta GeorgianAtlanta, GA
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
GUARANTEE TRUST CAN MEET DEBTS Insolvency of the Guarantee and Trust Company, because it has not a sufficient reserve fund, is the "solid ground" upon which Judge John T. Pendleton rests his decision against that concern, according to the order he has entered in the case. He states that the company has sufficient assets to cover its liabilities, but that it does not meet with the requirements of the act of 1904, which requires that there be enough assets invested to equal the reserve fund with 3 1-2 per cent interest. Many of the investments of the Guarantee, he says, are "in the teeth of the act of 1904." The concern is trustee of the reserve fund in every sense of the term, he says, and while legal title to this fund remains with the company, the beneficiary interest is with the bondholders. Part of this reserve, he holds, has been misappropriated. He named John D. Robison, of A. M. Robinson Company, receiver, but this is merely a nominal appointment, as the receivership is held up pending the filing of a bill of exceptions, and then pending the outcome of the case in the Supreme Court. The order of the court restrains the company from carrying on its business, other than conserving assets.
4.July 15, 1913Atlanta GeorgianAtlanta, GA
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
Guarantee Heads To Be Defendants Judge Pendleton announced from the bench Tuesday that he would issue an order in the Guarantee Banking and Trust Company litigation making S. E. Smith, president of the company; H. S. Miles, secretary and treasurer, and W. A. Foster and George H. Sims, directors, parties defendant in the action. J. N. Robertson, appointed receiver for the company pending a decision by the Supreme Court, will act as receiver for the property of the four men, keeping it intact until the litigation is settled.
5.September 28, 1913Atlanta GeorgianAtlanta, GA
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
Kirkwood Lots Bring $12,400.
Thirty-one city lots in Kirkwood, comprising about eight acres have been sold by the receivers of the Guarantee Trust and Banking Company to Collier brothers for $12,400. This is known as the Robson subdivision, with 460 feet of frontage on Hardee street, 940 on Robson place, 550 on Kirkwood road, 450 on Emery street and 560 on Norwood avenue.
The terms were practically cash. J. E. Pritchett, of the L. P. Bloomfield Real Estate Agency, represented buyer and seller.
6.February 5, 1914Atlanta GeorgianAtlanta, GA
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
Quitclaim Deeds. $1-Atlanta Realty Investment Company to Mrs. S. C. Wilburn. No. 49 Dargan street, lot 50 by 139 feet. January 26. $325 -Guarantee Trust and Banking Company (by receivers) to Jean Harrell, lot 46 by 150 feet, east side Brooklyn avenue, 184 feet north of Trabert avenue. January 20. $325 Same to May Harrell, lot 46 by 150 feet, east side Brooklyn avenue, 138 feet north of Trabert avenue. January 20. $15-City of Atlanta to F. R. McContinued on Next Page.
7.February 5, 1914Atlanta GeorgianAtlanta, GA
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
Quitclaim Deeds. $1-Atlanta Realty Investment Company to Mrs. S. C. Wilburn, No. 49 Dargan street, lot 50 by 139 feet. January 26. $325-Guarantee Trust and Banking Company (by receivers) to Jean Harrell, lot 46 by 150 feet, east side Brooklyn avenue, 184 feet north of Trabert avenue. January 20. $325-Same to May Harrell, lot 46 by 150 feet, east side Brooklyn avenue, 138 feet north of Trabert avenue. January 20. $15-City of Atlanta to F. R. McContinued on Next Page.
8.March 31, 1914Atlanta GeorgianAtlanta, GA
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
# Receiver Named for Paulding Power Co.
A petition asking for a receiver for the Paulding County Power Company, at Dallas, Ga., has been filed in Fulton Superior Court by Harold Hirsch and James D. Robinson, receivers for the Guarantee Bank and Trust Company, of Atlanta.
The power company is one of a number of concerns in which the trust company was interested at the time it failed several months ago. Stephen Tighe, of Dallas, was named by the courts as receiver for the power company.
9.March 31, 1914Atlanta GeorgianAtlanta, GA
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
# Receiver Named for Paulding Power Co.
A petition asking for a receiver for the Paulding County Power Company, at Dallas, Ga., has been filed in Fulton Superior Court by Harold Hirsch and James D. Robinson, receivers for the Guarantee Bank and Trust Company, of Atlanta.
The power company is one of a number of concerns in which the trust company was interested at the time it failed several months ago. Stephen Tighe, of Dallas, was named by the courts as receiver for the power company.
10.March 31, 1914Atlanta GeorgianAtlanta, GA
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
# Receiver Named for Paulding Power Co.
A petition asking for a receiver for the Paulding County Power Company, at Dallas, Ga., has been filed in Fulton Superior Court by Harold Hirsch and James D. Robinson, receivers for the Guarantee Bank and Trust Company, of Atlanta.
The power company is one of a number of concerns in which the trust company was interested at the time it failed several months ago. Stephen Tighe, of Dallas, was named by the courts as receiver for the power company.
11.March 31, 1914Atlanta GeorgianAtlanta, GA
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
# Receiver Named for Paulding Power Co.
A petition asking for a receiver for the Paulding County Power Company, at Dallas, Ga., has been filed in Fulton Superior Court by Harold Hirsch and James D. Robinson, receivers for the Guarantee Bank and Trust Company, of Atlanta.
The power company is one of a number of concerns in which the trust company was interested at the time it failed several months ago. Stephen Tighe, of Dallas, was named by the courts as receiver for the power company.
12.March 31, 1914Atlanta GeorgianAtlanta, GA
Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
# Receiver Named for Paulding Power Co.
A petition asking for a receiver for the Paulding County Power Company, at Dallas, Ga., has been filed in Fulton Superior Court by Harold Hirsch and James D. Robinson, receivers for the Guarantee Bank and Trust Company, of Atlanta.
The power company is one of a number of concerns in which the trust company was interested at the time it failed several months ago. Stephen Tighe, of Dallas, was named by the courts as receiver for the power company.
Bank runs are almost always and everywhere a deterioration of bank fundamentals.
But not for you.
You are the measure-zero exception: great fundamentals, solid bank, and yet the Diamond Dybvig fairy spread its rumor. Depositors woke up. Your collateral was not prepositioned. The Clearinghouse had it for you.
Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200. Go directly to jail… or worse.
Flag Article for Review
Flag Episode for Review
Guarantee Trust & Banking Company · UID 5567451191362