Article Text
To the Citizens of Atlantic City:
OME time prior to its closing, the Chelsea Second National Bank S borrowed a large amount of money from The Philadelphia National Bank, and deposited with that bank as collateral certain bonds, stocks, mortgages and notes, both secured and unsecured, the latter representing loans made by the Chelsea Second National Bank to its customers. When the Chelsea Second National Bank closed on January 26th, 1933, the balance owing to The Philadelphia National Bank was $889,677.78. In accordance with proper banking practice and for its own protection, The Philadelphia National Bank on January 27th, 1933, called the loan of the Chelsea Second National Bank and notified the Receiver of that institution that it demanded payment of the obligation. The Receiver of the Chelsea Second National Bank did not have sufficient money to pay this debt thus releasing the collateral, and The Philadelphia National Bank was obliged to become the liquidator of the loan. The marketable bonds and stocks were disposed of carefully over a period of approximately twelve months at prices which were considered satisfactory.
The greater part of the remaining collateral consisted of customers' notes: -i. e. obligations of the depositors of the Chelsea Second National Bank to that bank. Obviously, these notes could not be liquidated in the same manner as stocks and bonds because there was no market for such obligations. The only method of liquidation which could be adopted by The Philadelphia National Bank was to collect the amount thereof from their respective makers, all of whom were citizens of Atlantic City and its vicinity. The Philadelphia National Bank was alive to the fact that each one of the makers of these notes was a depositor in the Chelsea Second National Bank and had suffered the loss of his deposit by reason of the closing of the Bank; and it knew that by reason of the Chelsea Second National Bank pledging such notes, the makers of the notes had lost their right to offset against the amount owing on the notes, the amount of their deposits in the Chelsea Second National Bank. The Philadelphia National Bank was advised that it had the legal right to compel the makers of such notes to pay the full amount thereof, even though such makers had lost their deposits with the closing of the bank. It was definitely the duty of The Philadelphia National Bank to liquidate these notes and credit the amount collected against the loan of the Chelsea Second National Bank; but in collecting from the makers it was obvious that it would be working a hardship on them to collect the full amount of the note because of the circumstances above recited. In the first few collections, therefore, which the bank made, it effected settlements with each maker by having such maker pay in cash the difference between the face amount of his note and the amount of his deposit in the Chelsea Second National Bank, and took from him an assignment of his claim against the Chelsea Second National Bank for such deposit.
Notice of these settlements was given by The Philadelphia National Bank to the Receiver of the Chelsea Second National Bank prior to the settlements being effected; and when the settlements were consummated the Receiver of the Chelsea Second National Bank was informed of them and also advised that the cash received in such settlement had been credited against the loan of The Philadelphia National Bank to the Chelsea Second National Bank.
The Receiver notified The Philadelphia National Bank that he could not approve of such settlements, and that if The Philadelphia National Bank did not collect the full amount of the notes in cash from the makers thereof, it must nevertheless credit on its loan to the Chelsea Second National Bank the full face amount of such notes, even though it had compromised them for less.
Faced with this ultimatum, but still being unwilling to force the depositors of the Chelsea Second National Bank by legal means or otherwise to pay the full face amount of their notes without regard to the losses suffered by them in the closing of the bank, The Philadelphia National Bank through its counsel took up the matter with the office of the Comptroller of the Currency at Washington by letter sent early in December, 1933, in which was set forth not only The Philadelphia National Bank's right to make such settlements, but the desirability of so doing under all the circumstances. A similar practice had been followed by The Philadelphia National Bank in liquidating the loans made by it in number of cases to other closed banks, and no objection by other receivers of banks had ever been filed. No reply was received to the communication sent to the Comptroller's office until almost the middle of February, 1934, a period of practically two months and a half; and in the meantime, The Philadelphia National Bank had continued to make some settlements on the basis described. The communication from the Comptroller's office supported the position taken by the Receiver of the Chelsea Second National Bank and declared that where such settlements were made without the consent of the Receiver and of the Comptroller, The Phila elphia National Bank must give credit for the full face value of such notes IN ALL CASES WHERE IT HAD NOT
REDUCED THE COLLATERAL TO ITS OWN POSSESSION. If there- fore The Philadelphia National Bank wished to continue the liquidation of the notes on a basis which it thought fair to the depositors in and borrowers from the Chelsea Second National Bank, it now had no alternative but to follow the legal principle set forth in the letter from the Comptroller's office and reduce to its own possession all the collateral remaining in its hands as security for the Chelsea Second National Bank's loan.
FOR THIS REASON ALONE, AND WITH ONLY THIS PURPOSE IN MIND, THE PHILADELPHIA NATIONAL BANK, ACTING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE NOTE OF THE CHELSEA SECOND NATIONAL BANK WHICH IT HELD, ADVERTISED FOR SALE AND SOLD AT PUBLIC AUCTION ALL OF THE REMAINING COLLATERAL
Under the terms of its note, it could sell the collateral at any time with or without notice, at public or private sale, and could become the purchaser of the collateral offered freed from all trusts. Not only was the sale advertised, although there was no legal necessity for it, but the Receiver of the Chelsea Second National Bank was advised of the sale by registered mail and the Reconstruction Finance Corporation which held an assignment of any equity that there might have been in the collateral, was also notified of the sale by registered mail. With the exception of a few items, there were cutside bids for all parcels disposed of.
The Reconstruction Finance Corporation had made a loan to the Chelsea Second National Bank subsequent to the loan of The Philadelphia National Bank, and the Chelsea Second National Bank had assigned to the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, as part of the security for such loan, all or any equity that there might be in the collateral held by The Philadelphia National Bank as security for its loan.
Neither the Receiver nor the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, made any attempt to protect their respective interests. Since the sale has been held, the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, at its own request, has been given every opportunity to make a reappraisal of all of the assets of the Chelsea Second National Bank which had been pledged with The Philadelphia National Bank.
IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT NO OFFER HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY THE PHILADELPHIA NATIONAL BANK EVEN CLOSELY APPROACHING THE BALANCE DUE TO SAID BANK, IT MUST IN JUSTICE BE ASSUMED THAT NEITHER THE RECEIVER OF THE CHELSEA SECOND NATIONAL BANK, THE RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION NOR THE BANKS IN ATLANTIC CITY, WHICH HELD A FURTHER ASSIGNMENT OF ANY EQUITY WHICH MIGHT HAVE EXISTED AFTER THE CLAIM OF THE RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION, BELIEVE ANY EQUITY EXISTS IN THE COLLATERAL OVER AND ABOVE THE AMOUNT DUE THE PHILADELPHIA NATIONAL BANK.
THE PHILADELPHIA NATIONAL BANK