Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
BANKS CLOSE DUE TO WITHDRAWAL OF FUNDS
DES MOINES, IA., December 31.—(By the Associated Press)—Two Des Moines banks, the Mechanics' Savings and the Commercial Savings closed today and were taken over by the state banking department, due it was announced to prospective or actual heavy withdrawals of public and private funds.
The banking department this afternoon was unofficially informed that the First National Bank of Denison, Iowa, the bank of Dow City, Iowa, and the Traders' Bank of Vail, Iowa, also had been closed because of heavy withdrawals. These three institutions were said to be closely related. Robert Leach, superintendent of banking, had not been advised of the details of their difficulties.
Inability of the banks to obtain surety for the public funds, deposited by the state, by Des Moines, Polk county and the school board, was said to have caused the action, the depositors being compelled under the law to withdraw the funds in the absence of depository bonds. The bank, it was said, was unable to withstand such a heavy withdrawal.
The Commercial Savings Bank which carried deposits of $1,500,000 in public money was the first to close, officers stating they had been advised of the probable withdrawal of the funds because surety companies declined to renew depository bonds.
The Mechanics' Bank, it was said, was closely allied with the Commercial and held $115,000 of state funds which were not fully covered by sureties, in addition to large deposits by insurance companies centering here. Officers of the Mechanics' Bank offered no explanation except that heavy withdrawals had prompted their action.
The necessity for withdrawal of public money to be turned over to the incoming state treasurer by the present treasurer who closes up his accounts tonight was said unofficially to have had a bearing on the bank suspensions.
The closing followed closely upon an opinion by Attorney General Ben Gibson that public funds under a new state law, were not preferred claims. This it was believed, led the surety companies to decline further guarantees of public money until the question was decided by the courts.