Click image to open full size in new tab
Article Text
A SUGGESTIVE CONTRAST. Let two items be contrasted : The experts employed by Senator Davis's investigating committee, after spending a year in minute scrutiny, report that the books of the United States Treasury balance to a cent, though transactions amounting to many thousand millions have been made by successive Republican Secretaries and their many subordinates, during all the excitement, haste, and demoralization of a great civil war. But the Treasurer of the Democratic State of Missouri officially reports that he has $506,187 80 in the defunct Mastin Bank ; that be demanded from the bank money to pay the July interest on the State bonds, and was informed by the officers that they could not comply with his order at once, but would make the remittance very soon after "July ;" that instead of instantly bringing the bank to account for State funds in its charge, he came to this city and borrowed from the Bank of Commerce $220,000 for payment of the interest; that the bank has not only made no remittance, but has failed. It is true he states that he holds a bond in the sum of $1,000,000, with the two Mastins and four other persons as securities, but it does not appear how much property they have that can be reached. He also holds $350,000 bonds of the Kansas City water works, but these bonds have been on the market for months and are yet unsold, and it is stated that they are virtually tied up and rendered at present unsalable by a suit commenced by Colonel Green for the appointment of a receiver. Under these peculiar circumstances, the State Treasury is unable to meet interest on the State debt, and will be unable for some time to come, unless an extra session of the Legislature should be called. It has been the habit of Democrats to make a great fuss over alleged fraud and corruption in the financial management of the Government by Republican officials, and to point "with pride" to the conduct of Democrats in office, with the boast that, when Democrats get the power, all sorts of misconduct will cease. The history of Democratic county officials in Ohio has recently been stated; it appears that, in more than half the counties under Democratic rule, public funds have been stolen by officials. But the transactions in Missouri are peculiarly instructive. About six years ago the Mastin Bank managed to elect as Treasurer of Jackson County, Missouri, which embraces Kansas City, a Confederate veteran named Mercer. From that time the bank became virtually the County Treasury, and was enabled to go into various operations which promised profit. During his term of office, we believe, the bank began to make advances on the contract for the Kansas City water works. Presently the pure and impeccable Democracy held a convention to nominate State officers, with assurance of carrying the State. The Mastin Bank saw another chance, and, by combinations with certain active politicians, contrived to secure the nommation of its friend, Mercer, for State Treasurer. It was currently reported that a great part of the expenses of the campaign was contributed by persons interested in the bank, and after the election the Mastin Bank became the chief depositary of State funds, its managers and friends becoming the Treasurer's bondsmen. Since that time the opportunity for large operations has been fine; and among these operations was an advance to the waterworks company, for which. it appears, the bank took $350,000 bonds of that company, which it deposited with the State Treasurer as security for his deposits, besides other bonds of the same company now advertised for sale here. Rumors of extensive use of State funds in private, political or newspaper enterprises were widely cirenlated, but when Mercer's term ended, the same combination of politicians and bankers managed to nominate Mr. Gates, the present Treasurer. As part of the money in the treasury, Mercer turned over to him a check for $297,000 upon the Mastin Bank, with the sanction of the Democratic auditing committee. This check has never been met, though it was given about January 1, 1877, but Mr. Gates has continued bis intimate relations and heavy deposits with the bank. Now it is proposed by the State authorities to sue Mercer and his bondsmen on the check, but they will of course show formal quittance of responsibility by the auditing committee. Treasurer Gates has not only continued to