Peoples Home Savings Bank (San Francisco, CA)

Episode Information

Episode UID
2536772291117
Episode Type
Suspension โ†’ Closure
Bank Type
savings
Bank ID
253677229 hash
Start Date
January 1, 1893*
Location
San Francisco, California (37.780, -122.419)

Metadata

Model
gpt-5-mini (chosen from majority vote of a three-model LLM ensemble)
Short Digest
1a7e236d59c79fd2

Response Measures

None

Description

Articles describe the bank's insolvency, appointment of a receiver, and permanent closure after the 1893 collapse.

Events (2)

1. January 1, 1893* Receivership
Newspaper Excerpt
appointment of a receiver for the People's Home Savings Bank came up. It was assigned to him and he appointed the receiver.
Source
newspapers
2. January 1, 1893* Suspension
Cause
Bank Specific Adverse Info
Cause Details
Institution rendered insolvent by fraudulent schemes, bad loans and diversion of funds tied to Pacific Bank; commissioners' investigation led to closing/receivership.
Newspaper Excerpt
collapse of the Pacific Bank and the People's Home Savings Bank
Source
newspapers

Newspaper Articles (6)

Article from The San Francisco Call, November 14, 1898

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

D. S. Dorn, A. F. Johns and M. H. Sherman were not only in the business of silencing some dishonest newspapers, but of corruptly influencing Bank Commissioners in the great plot to ruin the Pacific Bank and the People's Home Savings Bank. The letters of Sherman that are published this morning prove the charge. Over his own signature M. H. Sherman has confessed that he schemed to influence the official action of Bank Commissioners W. H. Knight and Charles Dunsmore. This plot was one of the most shameless in the whole history of the bank wreckers' conspiracy. Two months before the crash came Sherman and his confederates thoroughly understood that any honest investigation of the condition of the banks would result in the closing of the institutions. They therefore plotted to procure a favorable report. Nothing could be done by the dishonest manipulators to influence the official action of A. Gerberd r. who was president at that time of the Bank Commission. The wreckers could not fight Mr. Gerberding and they could not corrupt him. They contrived therefore to deceive him if possible. This dishonest task was assigned to D. S. Dorn, and he was so successful in getting Mr. Gerberding out of the way that Sherman congratulated him for his efforts. Sherman also shows in his remarkable letters that the judgment of Bank Commissioner Dunsmore would be influenced by the fact that Mr. Dunsmore's brother-in-law had been given employment by Sherman. Bank Commissioner Knight was a close personal friend of Sherman, who craftily remarks in one of his letters that at a very critical time in the history of the tottering institutions he had dined at the home of Mr. Knight in Oakland. The schemer also took OCcasion to thank J. E. Farnum, the manager of the People's Bank, for warning the bank wreckers of the coming of the Commissioners. Farnum, who is now the manager of the defunct Pacific Bank, was a son-in-law of Bank Commissioner Knight, and through that relationship secured the information that was so valuable to the conspirators. The warning was given in time to permit the dishonest bankers to fix up their affairs with some semblance of honesty. The letters of Sherman that give these revelations to the public are of great importance, and prove the accusation of The Call that Moses H. Sherman was not only the chief agent in ruining the Pacific Bank and the People's Home Savings Bank, but knew it, and was as dishonest in his transactions at that time as were the McDonalds. Not only was Sherman interested in the Phoenix wildcat schemes and his gigantic Los Angeles deal, but he was very deeply involved in assisting other manipulators to keep up their drain on the banks. In one of his telegrams he hysterically begs Dick for God's sake not to dishonor the checks of O. T. Dyer. In another he assures Dick that they must all stand together, for any disaster at that time would ruin them all and their banks. In this assertion Moses H. Sherman very clearly indicates that he considered the dishonest institutions as much his property as they were that of the McDonalds. There is possibly no more interesting letter than one which is published this morning to show the remarkable audacity of Sherman and his confederates. In this epistle Sherman declares that the other bankers of this city, such as I. W. Hellman, Lovell White, Thomas Brown and others, did


Article from The San Francisco Call, November 21, 1898

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

The conspirators who ruined the Pacifle Bank and the People's Home Savings Bank and their confidential advisors who assisted them in the destruction of the institutions were good and prolific letter writers. In its expose of the wrecking of the banks The Call has produced many sensational letters, but It will discuss this morning an epistle perhaps more sensational than the others. The Call has shown over the signature of Dr. R. H. McDonald and in the handwriting of his sons that the McDonald family, while they controlled the McDonald banks, were thieves. Moses H. Sherman has proved to the people of this city over his own signature that he is a corrupter of public officials. a briber of City Councils and the debaser of Bank Commissioners. The Call has also in its possession a letter in which Moses H. Sherman is accused of having paid four thousand dollars to J. Alva Watt of this city for the appointment of John F. Sheehan as the receiver of the People's Home Savings Bank. The letter in which this sensational accusation was made particularizes every detail of the alleged transaction even to the time and place when It is charged the money was paid. The history of the events which led up to this alleged crooked deal between the Los Angeles manipulator and the attorney are of grave moment. Sherman has already shown himself not


Article from The San Francisco Call, November 22, 1898

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

THE JUDGE AND THE RECEIVER Hebbard Tells How Sheehan Was Appointed to the Place. Judge Hebbard was Judge of Department No. 4 of the Superior Court when the complaint for the appointment of a receiver for the People's Home Savings Bank came up. It was assigned to him and he appointed the receiver. His story of the events of the appointment is as follows: "Some days before the question of a receiver was brought before me I met Colonel Kowalsky on the street and he asked me whom I was going to appoint as referee in the People's Home Savings Bank. I said I had not considered the matter and then he asked me to name General Warfield, as in case Warfield was appointed he would get the attorneyship. I made no definite reply and nothing more was said. A day or so after General Hart came into my court with'an order appointing a receiver which he wished me to fill out and'sign. He said he would like to have General Warfield appointed, but I told him the receiver was a man whom I was in a way responsible for and I wanted to put in a man I knew. I told him General Sheehan had done excellent service in the Emeric-Alvarado case and I knew him to be a com-


Article from The San Francisco Call, November 22, 1898

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

JUDGE HEBBARD CONTRADICTED Attorney James Alva Watt Says He Did Not Urge Any One for Receiver. James Alva Watt, who acted as attorney for Receiver Sheehan and the People's Home Savings Bank, emphatically denies that he in any way sought to have Sheehan appointed. Mr. Watt authorizes the following interview: "Any statement or any letter which says I asked for or received any sum of money from any person or persons connected with the People's Home or Pacific Banks, said money to be used either directly or indirectly for the purpose of influencing Judge Hebbard in appointing a receiver favorable to any one interested in the banks, does me a gross injustice and is a wicked, villainous lie. "I never received $4000 or any sum of money from M. H. Sherman, directly or indirectly. I never handled any money in this or any other case except for legitimate purposes." Replying to a question Mr. Watt said Judge Hebbard was mistaken in saying that he (Watt) urged the appointment of General Warfield as receiver, and that he (Watt) would be Warfield's attorney. Mr. Watt's words are: "I do not wish to contradict Judge Hebbard, but he is certainly mistaken. I did not ask him to appoint General Warfield nor did I tell him I was to be Warfield's attorney if he was put in of the is says charge Judge again mistaken bank's when affairs. he The I requested him to have myself appointed attorney for the receiver. I do not remember having had any conversation with Judge Hebbard regarding the receivership until after the appointment of General Sheehan. My recollecappointment tion of the incidents and the way relating I became to this attorney for the receiver and the bank is somewhat uncertain, but is substantially as follows: "I received the first intimation of General Sheehan's appointment from him. I was at home, sick, and did not come down town in the forenoon of the day the appointment was made. Shortly after noon General Sheehan telephoned me, asking me to come down town as he wished to see me on important business. I do not remember


Article from The San Francisco Call, November 27, 1898

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

in Tragic Story of a Day the Affairs of the Banks. The McDonalds Ordered to Give Up One Hundred Thousand Dollars in Coin. and Farnum and Sherman won out, and of In its expose of the shameless robto-day Mr. Farnum is the manager beries that were committed in the name the Pacific Bank. of the People's Home Savings Bank As already indicated in The Call the and the Pacific Bank The Call has of association of Mr. Farnum with the mentioned incidentally the name the McDonalds began through Moses H. John E. Farnum. This man is Sherman. It was through the agency present manager of the now defunct of Sherman that Farnum was placed in Pacific Bank, and The Call proposes to of the bank as a servant and a willing tell what part he took in the ruin tool of the McDonalds. Before the asthe institutions in which thousands of sociations were closed Farnum became men and women and children had one of the most uncompromising conplaced their savings. spirators, who forced from the McDonMr. Farnum's connection with the alds the remaining funds of the banks. People's Home Savings Bank dates, as Late in 1892 and early in 1893 the Paalready indicated in The Call, from a cific Bank was sorely in need of funds very early period in the conspiracy. He and was depending solely upon the was placed in the People's Home SavPeople's Home Savings Bank for its ings Bank by his relative, M. H. Sherresources. Sherman's schemes had alman. He used the funds of the savings institution to assist his relative, Sherready made the banks insolvent, but the deluded people of this city were still man, in every scheme that demanded assistance. He was something more pouring their money into the People's Home Savings Bank. This institution than Dr. McDonald believed. He was was nothing more or less than a sieve not only a servant of the McDonalds, through which the savings of deposibut for several years he was the dictator of their affairs. He stooped to tors dropped into the vaults of the Pacific Bank to be dissipated in their wild every dishonorable duty they demanded, and then having the dishonest speculations. Farnum knew the situabankers in his power he commanded tion thoroughly and knew what was them to do what he pleased. He sent expected of him. He knew that as soon them money from the People's Home as money came into the People's Home Savings Bank in a golden stream to Savings Bank it was to be sent to the the Pacific Bank in order that his relaPacific Bank and he carried out his contract to the letter. tive, Moses H. Sherman, might receive it; and when this stream seemed likely One of his first important letters in to be stopped even by the McDonalds reference to this proposition was writhe commanded the bankers by delibten early in 1893 and is as follows: SAN FRANCISCO, January 7, 1893. erate and absolute threats to give what Mr. R. H. McDonald Jr., vice-presimoney they had left for the worthless dent Pacific Bank, San Francisco, securities of Sherman. Cal.-Dear Sir: I send per our mesAfter John E. Farnum was placed in senger this morning twenty thousand the People's Home Savings Bank as ($20,000) dollars in coin. manager he became the "stool pigeon" We have on hand little more than and outside guard of the conspiracy. we think we will need in payment of It was his duty to warn the bank recent dividends. Besides, loans are wreckers whenever the Bank Commisnot being applied for to any great exsioners threatened to descend upon tent, and we cannot afford to keep the cash on hand without getting any them. It was his privilege to tell them interest thereon. what the authorities were likely to do A year ago our board of directors As soon as the money of thousands of decided to have the rate of interest poor depositors was placed in the changed which your bank allowed us vaults of the People's Home Savings from six per cent to four and half Bank it was the duty of Farnum to per cent. with the expectation that the send it to the Pacific Bank. After both money would be available for loans institutions became insolvent this man and investments within six months thereafter. continued in control, and even when While we have gradually drawn the McDonalds wished to call a halt he down our balance, still is of such commanded them to continue their sum as not to be of moment to us: and depredations and to permit Moses H. if your bank can now allow us from the Sherman to foist his worthless securifirst of January five per cent on our upon the savings institution. daily balances I know it would be This terrible affair in which Farnum greatly appreciated by our directors. Please let me know if that meets played the leading part did not end with your favor, and will be glad to until long after the collapse of the Pabring the matter up before our board cific Bank and the People's Home Savat their next meeting. Yours truly, ings Bank. When Sherman found it J. E. FARNUM, Secretary. impossible to keep his relative in the The foregoing letter, which was writPeople's Bank he thrust Farnum upon ten by Farnum in January, 1893, was in the Pacific Bank, and there he remains measure somewhat formal. A month as the director and manager of what remains to the deluded and robbed and a week afterward Mr. Farnum creditors of the institution. wrote another letter in which he The events that are incidental to the showed clearly how the People's Home Savings Bank was being bled to susplacing of John E. Farnum in the Peotain the dying energies of the Pacific ple's Home Savings Bank and after that in the Pacific Bank are of timely Bank. The Call promised to prove that interest. Farnum was a member of the the People's Home Savings Bank was Legislature when the Bank Commissimply a feeder for the Pacific Bank, sioner act of this State was adopted. and in the following letter of John E. Farnum that promise is kept: As a member of the Legisiature Farnum possessed some influence, and SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 15, 1893. with that influence he succeeded in R. H. McDonald Jr., Pacific BankDear Sir: Yours at hand, and in reply having himself made a member of the permit me to say that the R. Coal Bank Commission. In that capacity Company paid only a portion of their he became acquainted with the affairs loan yesterday, but expect to coland private doings of the banks of this lect in all of it this week if possible. State. He became connected with a send you $10,000 coin this a. m., and bank in Pasadena and familiarized will continue to send our surplus himself with banking methods. This money for our credit with you. Your was long before Sherman planned his apprehension as per your letter may tremendous raid on the People's Home be well founded, but do not look for anything of that nature, although it Savings Bank and the Pacific Bank. is well enough to be prepared. B. O. Carr, a brother-in-law of Moses do not know what your ideas are, H. Sherman, was the first manager of but presume there is to be limit the People's Home Savings Bank. Mr. to the amount that you expect to reCarr was an honest man and necessarceive from us and a time beyond which the special deposits are expected to ily was useless to Sherman. After cease. Please let me know about that Sherman became a director in the Paand oblige, yours truly. cific Bank in January, 1891. he succeedJ. E. FARNUM. ed in securing for his relative, Farnum, the position of manager of the People's Two months later affairs in the PeoHome Savings Bank. ple's Home Savings Bank and the PaThe McDonalds had at that time cific Bank were becoming critical. The enormous debt of the Pacific Bank was plunged into hazardous speculation. The funds of the Pacific Bank and the rapidly approaching $1,000,000, and, notwithstanding the compliance of the People's Home Savings Bank were beBank Commissioners, it was imperative ing dissipated in crazy schemes and unwarranted ventures. Sherman had something should be done. Farnum and Frank McDonald understood thoralready involved the McDonalds and their banks in his Phoenix schemes oughly that it was impossible to conand he was prepared to inveigle them tinue thedepredationsupon the People's Bank any longer, and a series of teleinto the great Los Angeles electric road deal. Farnum was necessary, therefore, grams passed between the conspirators. to the success of Sherman's plot and These telegrams show how clearly the the man who is now manager of the bank wreckers understood that they Pacific Bank was placed in full conwould have to settle their accounts in trol as manager of the People's Home the People's Bank. This, however, was Savings Bank. He had absolute power impossible, and affairs had drifted to in that position until the final collapse. such a stage that Farnum himself took When the end came he resigned his the reins and forced upon the dishonest position, under instructions, and rebankers the concluding outrages of tired from the bank. Almost instantly, Sherman. He not only insisted that through the agency of Moses H. SherSherman should be tolerated in his disman, Farnum was replaced. honest manipulations, but he planned The Call has already exploited the to foist upon the banks several more of scheme of the Los Angeles manipulaSherman's worthless loans. The chief tor to control the liquidation of the of these loans was in reference to the Electric Railroad of Phoenix, Ariz. People's Home Savings Bank. SherThis road, as The Call has already man had determined to protect his disreputable interests in the bank and shown, was built at an expense not exFarnum was selected as his agent. ceeding $35,000. With this investment Sherman floated a bond issue of $66.When Farnum was appointed as re000. These bonds the Los Angeles and ceiver, however, those who were interPhoenix manipulator foisted upon the ested in the honest closing of the bank Pacific Bank and the People's Home rebelled and Farnum had the unenviaSavings Bank. These two institutions ble honor of being the receiver of the as far as money was concerned were bank for two hours. He never obtained one. Sherman had Frank McDonald actual possession and was thrown out to be succeeded by others. absolutely under his control, and he had had his relative, John E. Farnum, Notwithstanding this tremendous dein the People's Bank. The McDonalds feat Sherman was persistent. He still had already given $66,000 for the bonds had the Bank Commission in his power of the Phoenix Railroad, which was and with the assistance of Attorney subsequently known as the Valley General Hart and others he placed FarStreet Electric Railroad. Sherman's num in the Pacific Bank as receiver. A series of legal complications followed agents, who happened to be dishonest


Article from Albuquerque Daily Citizen, July 28, 1899

Click image to open full size in new tab

Article Text

ARIZONA TOPICS. Phoenix Street Railway Insolvent-Vavapai County Bonds, The Third district court of Arizona has ordered foreclosure of the bonds of the Phoenix street electric railway, issued at 6 per cent, in 1893, to the amount of $250,000. The debts now aggregate $356,427. The main creditor isthe receiver ofthe People's Home Savings bank of San Francisco, who holds 165 $1,000 bonds, on which no interest has been paid since 1894. These bonds were originally owned by the Pacific bank of San Francisco and figured prominently in the investigation made into the affairs of that institution after its failure. The main stockholder and president of the company 18 M. H. Sherman, formerly of Phoenix.